Black Panther is revolutionary

“Black Panther” is a spectacle. With its embedded African culture, breathtaking colors, and perfectly orchestrated fight scenes, it’s one of Marvel’s best movies by far. But the biggest message of the story? Wakanda, the fictional home of T’challa (Black Panther), is a vision of what Africa could have looked like had it not suffered from imperialism.

To outsiders, Wakanda is merely a third-world country that has chosen to isolate itself from foreign affairs. However, behind the cloaking device, the nation colorfully sprawls across a beautiful landscape in the form of technologically-advanced buildings and traditional architecture. As it turns out, Wakanda is perhaps the nation superior in technology. Its mines are rich with the fictional material Vibranium, the strongest metal in the Marvel universe.

The advancements of Wakanda are completely hidden to the world. This is the conflict that T’challa must face once he becomes king as a result of the events of “Captain America: Civil War.” Is it his responsibility to share these resources to the rest of the world, to suffering black communities in America, to other African nations affected by imperialism?

The villain Killmonger certainly seems to think so. He dreams of using Wakanda’s resources–and weapons–to arm oppressed African descendants everywhere to allow them to usurp their governments. T’challa’s vision of a peaceful country clashes with Killmonger’s militancy. Naturally, a compromise evolves by the end of the film.

“Black Panther” gives widespread representation for black men and women. There are only two notable white characters in the story, and the royal family of Wakanda is protected by an all-female army called the Dora Milaje. Additionally, T’challa is frequently accompanied on-screen by three inspiring women: Nakia, a spy with charitable intentions, Okoye, the loyal leader of the Dora Milaje, and Shuri, his genius younger sister. This representation of black females is profoundly important. It proves that female-led superhero movies can be done successfully.

Shuri was by far my favorite character. With perfectly-timed one-liners like “Great, another broken white boy for us to fix,” and “Don’t scare me like that, colonizer!” she steals nearly every scene she’s in. Her intelligence rivals that of Tony Stark, but she is only a teenager. Her creations like remotely driven automobiles and kinetic energy-absorbing super suits pry her from the mold of the typical Disney princess.

“Black Panther” has allowed people of color to infiltrate the mainstream media. Director Ryan Coogler pays homage to his hometown of Oakland, which is unsurprising considering his work on Fruitvale Station and the origins of the Black Panther Party. Killmonger is a villain that the audience can sympathize with to an extent. T’challa, Nakia, Okoye, and Shuri are all tastefully developed. Coogler has done a truly amazing job with his latest adaptation. Black Panther sets a wholesome example of the representation that is so duly needed in cinema, all while curating a captivating, emotional, and action-packed story.

 

One thought on “Black Panther is revolutionary

  • February 23, 2018 at 12:11 pm
    Permalink

    I think this is an overhyped response to the movie, I enjoyed the movie and it was more fun than I thought it would be but it certainly is no Winter Soldier. For the most part Wakanda is a hierarchical ethno-state, that is only powerful because an asteroid full of vibranium landed there, that seems to not care about the literal destitute poverty that exists in the part of Wakanda that isn’t behind the cloaking device. It also makes little to no sense why Wakanda would isolate itself rather than take over all of Africa and even beyond when the asteroid first landed, because that’s kinda how all ancient nations worked even African ones.

    Also it seems weird that this movie would be labeled revolutionary when we already had movies like the Blade Trilogy and Hancock, both of which were better than this movie. It also was weird that T’challa became bland and uninteresting in this movie compared to when he was in Civil War. Shuri was straight up the most annoying character in the entire movie to the point where she threw in a “What are those” reference, a meme that was dead years before this movie even came out and is so bad that I physically recoiled in my seat. It also seems weird that she is one of the only scientists that we see and there appears to be no senior staff in all of Wakanda and a 16 year old girl is running everything. Nakia was mostly uninteresting and I actually forgot about her near the end of the movie. Okoye was a little unrelatable as a character but still gave a good performance, Killmonger however was by far one of the best villians in the MCU only beaten by Loki. Other than that Forest Whitaker’s character is literally the same one that he played in “Star Wars: Rogue One,” making it seem like whenever someone needs a mystical black man they just call him up.

    Finally while I really like Ryan Coogler and his work it is kinda clear that he is out of his element here. Creed was better than it had any right to be but just because you can make a good indie film doesn’t mean you can make a multi-million dollar motion picture.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: